My son has now reached the inquisitive stage of early
childhood, more succinctly known as the “Why?” phase. I am still trying to find
a balance between encouraging this critical moment of cognitive development and
not overloading him with unnecessary information. An example would be in the
parking lot of one of his T-Ball games when I pointed out that his teammate was
getting out of the car next to us with his father (also the coach):
Me: There is the coach and your friend getting out of that
car.
Him: Why?
Me: They rode together to come to the game.
Him: Why?
Me: Because the coach is his dad and the whole family came in
one car just like we did.
Him: Why?
Me: Why did they ride in the same car?
Him: No….Why is the coach his dad?
It was at this juncture that I had to make a critical choice.
I could redirect the line of question to
something innocuous or follow him down
the rabbit hole. I chose poorly……
Me: Because he and your friend’s mommy are his parents.
Him: Why?
Me: Because before he was born they met, found each other
mutually attractive and decided to commit to a relationship that involved
having children.
Him: Why?
I was briefly tempted to begin a soliloquy on societal norms
and the ethics of procreation and monogamy, but thankfully my son rescued me
from my own moronic impulses by asking, “Did they bring snacks?”
We have also recently begun having discussions about employment,
capitalism and economic inequality. Just about every morning my son will ask me
why I have to go to work. I had previously been able to placate him with
something vague about it “being a workday” but this sort of thing no longer
suffices. I then told him that I went to work so that I could get money to pay
our bills. He countered with the inevitable “Why?” and I did not think that he
was ready for the Adam-Smith-reciprocal-economy-versus-capitalism talk, so I
just told him that when we go to the grocery we need money to get food.
He then asked if it “costs me anything” to go to work.
Feeling that it was unnecessary to shoulder him the with concept of the mental
- and occasionally emotional - burdens of providing for the economic security
of the ones you love, I just told him that if it costs you money to go to work
then “you are doing it wrong.”
This seemed to satisfy him, but I know that it will not be
long until I am faced with more “why” questions and I am thankful that I get
some practice runs before I have to explain hatred, poverty, famine, war and
why the U.S. Postal Service cannot seem to move a package between two contiguous
states without going through Texas first.
The day is rapidly approaching where I will no longer be able
to give him easy answers. As difficult as it will be, perhaps my job is simply
to equip him to wrestle with the mystery of existence. Even more importantly, how
to find peace while existing in that mystery. He is going to ask why people hurt
each other. Why he will grow up with advantages (and burdens) that were not
available to (or placed upon) his peers. Why the society he lives in puts so
much emphasis on characteristics we have taught him are superficial and
secondary. Why it is entirely possible to do the right thing and be rewarded
with the wrong outcome and why heartache and loss can make you feel that your
soul is being ripped apart.
I look forward to the man he will become, but there will
always be a part of me that wishes I could protect and preserve the innocence
of his childhood. That some part of his spirit could forever reside within the
confines of an existence that knows only unconditional love from those
appreciate his sensitivity, his heart, and his curiosity for what they are: a glimpse
of the God whose grace allows contentment and mystery to coexist.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.