I was recently sent an alarming article (by one of my much
appreciated “weird news” benefactors) detailing the misadventures of 4-year-old
Scarlett. Scarlett is a UK resident who, along with her mother, was recently
featured on a Channel 5 documentary called Blinging
Up Baby which chronicled several child beauty pageant contestants. Scarlett’s
mother Leann fabricated a Hooter’s waitress costume for her daughter to wear
while suggestively gyrating on stage. When asked to address the imminent
criticism she knew she would receive from other parents, Leann responded thusly:
"Some people may say it's controversial, especially the theme I've chosen, but at the end of the day, little girls wear swimming costumes to the beach all summer, and that's not a controlled environment. The environment my kids go in is a controlled environment and it is ticket-entry only,"
Certainly one would be hard-pressed to name an event with a
more rigorous audience screening process than a child-beauty pageant, but I am
not sure that the ability to procure a paper ticket is indicative of safety. All that really tells us is that everyone watching the event really
wanted to be there and was willing to pay for the privilege of attendance. I
suppose you are at least eliminating the destitute, opportunistic creepers in favor
of the employed, methodical ones.
The more immediate concern is the psychological impact of a
parent living vicariously through their daughter in what is increasingly
becoming an over-sexualized environment. Certainly not all child-beauty
pageants feature grinding kindergarteners in hot-pants, but it is somewhat
upsetting that child beauty reviews is becoming one of our countries better
known exports.
So concerned was France, that in 2013 their Senate voted to
ban beauty pageants for contestants under 16. The bill also outlined up to 2
years imprisonment for adults attempting to enter their children in banned
events; and this is all from a country that makes America’s cultural norms on
sexuality and nudity seem prudish by comparison.
The program also highlighted other British families that have
been supposedly influenced by what the program termed “U.S. style child beauty
pageants.” My personal favorite was Sophia May, who legally named her young daughters
Princess Bliss and Precious Belle. Regardless of context, I believe that naming
your child “Princess Bliss” constitutes an act of cruelty and should be
investigated.
Perhaps the poor little girl can turn her unfortunate moniker in
a Japanese anime series. On the other hand, Precious Belle sounds like the name
of Elvis Presley’s backup plane and almost guarantees she would never been
taken seriously in a corporate office.
I suppose it is difficult for me to identify the positive aspects
of child beauty pageants and perhaps those who support them can enlighten me. So
often it seems that the parent continues to force participation long after the
child has lost interest (if they had any to begin with). To be fair, I also
realize that no one gets featured on a reality show by exhibiting common sense
and restraint so I am certainly basing my opinion on these outliers (along with repeated viewings of Little Miss Sunshine). One day
Princess Bliss may cite her stint in child beauty pageants as the catalyst
behind her success in the field of microbiology and numerous studies will show
that girls who participated in these events are happier and better adjusted
than their non-pageanted peers. I suppose anything is possible…..
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.